Accessibility statement
What this site does to stay usable by as many people as possible, what is still unsolved, and how to tell us when something blocks you. No conformance level is claimed on this page.
Usable access comes first
We want this site to be usable by people who navigate by keyboard, by people using screen readers, by people who enlarge text, and by people who ask their system to reduce motion. Those are not treated as a final polish step — they are part of how the pages are built.
Being committed to access is not the same as having proven it. This statement is deliberately split into what is supported, what is known to be short, and how to report a problem — so nothing below reads as more confidence than we can back up.
What is in place today
These describe the current build of this site. They are statements about what has been implemented, not a conformance claim against any standard.
Keyboard navigation
Every interactive element on the site can be reached and operated with a keyboard alone — no pointer required to move through menus, cards or forms.
Visible focus indicators
Keyboard focus is drawn as a visible ring. The global stylesheet defines a focus-visible rule for the whole site rather than leaving it to individual components.
Semantic headings
Pages are built with ordered heading levels — one H1 per page with structured H2 and H3 sections beneath it — so the outline of a page can be read and navigated.
Alt text on images
Images published on the site carry alternative text describing what they show, and decorative imagery is hidden from assistive technology rather than read aloud.
Reduced motion
Motion respects the prefers-reduced-motion system setting: animations and transitions are reduced or removed when the operating system asks for that.
Text scaling
Type and spacing are set so that text can be enlarged in the browser or operating system while content stays readable.
What is not solved yet
Stated plainly, because an accessibility statement that only lists strengths is not useful to anyone deciding whether they can use a site.
Third-party embedded media
Some embedded media supplied by third parties may not carry captions or transcripts. Where that is the case, the media is not currently usable by someone who cannot hear the audio.
Colour contrast under review
Contrast on certain decorative surfaces is still under review. Text intended to be read is prioritised, but we do not claim every pairing on the site has been measured.
No external audit
No formal external accessibility audit has been completed. This statement describes what the site does and what it does not do — it is not the output of an audit.
No conformance level is claimed. This site does not claim to conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA or to any other published accessibility standard, and no external audit has been carried out to support such a claim. If a conformance claim is ever made, it will appear here first, with the audit that produced it.
Something blocked you? Tell us
If any part of this site was difficult or impossible to use, describe what you were trying to do, what happened, and which page it was on. Reports about barriers are read as defects, not as edge cases.
Last updated 27 September 2026. This page is reviewed when the site changes in a way that affects how it is used — and re-written if an external audit is ever commissioned.